Resources Case Study
Case Study

From AI Curiosity to AI Clarity: How a Founder Built a Clear Mental Model for AI Adoption

BP

Bhavin Pandya

Founder, Skyline BDC

About the Founder and the Company

Skyline BDC is a Mumbai-based brand communications and advertising firm working across brand strategy, digital marketing, and campaign execution. As its founder, Bhavin Pandya sits at the centre of client delivery, internal workflows, and technology decisions. Any change in tools or processes directly affects how his team works and how clients experience outcomes.

In this context, AI adoption isn't experimental—it has operational consequences.

The Context

By the time Bhavin attended the AI Essentials workshop, he wasn't approaching AI as a beginner.

He was already experimenting with different AI tools, exploring use cases in both business and personal contexts, and keeping pace with the rapidly evolving AI landscape. Like many founders, he had moved past skepticism and into active exploration.

But something was missing.

AI usage was increasing, but understanding wasn't keeping up.

The Underlying Challenge

The challenge wasn't access to tools—it was clarity of thinking.

Before the workshop:

  • AI terminology was familiar but loosely applied
  • Concepts like automation, agents, and workflows blurred into each other
  • Decisions were driven by trial-and-error rather than structure
  • Explaining AI concepts clearly to the team felt harder than it should have

This created friction. AI was present, but it wasn't yet systematic or easy to scale.

Why the Workshop Made Sense

Bhavin wasn't looking to collect more tools or shortcuts.

He wanted:

  • A clearer mental model of how AI concepts connect
  • Better judgment around when to use which approach
  • Less ambiguity before introducing AI more formally to his team

The objective was simple: understand AI properly before expanding its use.

The Shift During the Session

The most meaningful change wasn't technical—it was conceptual.

During the workshop:

  • Commonly misused AI terms were clearly differentiated
  • The relationship between tools, automation, and agentic systems became explicit
  • AI stopped feeling like a collection of disconnected capabilities
  • Decision-making shifted from experimentation to intention

"We were using these AI terms a little loosely earlier. After the session, I'm much more confident about where to use what, and how these tools actually work together based on the requirement."

— Bhavin Pandya

What Changed After

Post-workshop, Bhavin gained:

Confidence in identifying the right AI approach for specific needs
Clear language to explain AI concepts internally
A stronger foundation to guide his team without oversimplifying
The ability to experiment purposefully rather than randomly

Instead of accumulating tools, he gained clarity.

The Outcome

While the results weren't framed as numerical metrics, the impact was practical and immediate:

Reduced confusion around AI terminology
Greater confidence in AI-related decisions
Better readiness to introduce AI thinking at the team level
Clearer direction for integrating AI into everyday workflows

For Bhavin, the workshop aligned interest, understanding, and application.

Founder Takeaway

For founders already experimenting with AI, the real bottleneck isn't access—it's clarity.

This experience helped move from:

Trying tools Choosing approaches
Loose understanding Precise thinking
Individual experimentation Team-level clarity

AI became easier to explain, easier to apply, and easier to scale—because it finally made sense.

Why This Case Study Matters

This isn't a story about discovering AI.

It's about a founder who already knew something, but needed to understand AI properly before embedding it into how his business operates.

Because AI adoption doesn't fail due to lack of tools.
It fails due to unclear thinking.

Build Your AI Mental Model

Join founders and professionals who are moving from AI confusion to AI clarity.